Twitter? Hrm. Ok...
Yoav's post about twitter was interesting:
http://yoavs.blogspot.com/2009/01/one-curious-thing-about-twitter.html
Personally, I don't really see the appeal. So far there are only two uses I have for it:
Lance Armstrong writes a fair bit, and even posts some pictures, and since I am a huge cycling fan, that's kind of fun to read.
I use the search API to keep track of people talking about my stuff... Hecl, LangPop.com, and so on. That's kind of handy, but it feels more like a big wiretap than a "conversation".
Other than that, it's another firehose of data that I really don't need - I probably read too much junk on the internet as it is.
Trackbacks
Use the following link to trackback from your own site:
http://journal.dedasys.com/trackbacks?article_id=2126
about 1 hour later:
It works best as a social thing - regular information distribution isn't it's forte.
about {{count}} hours later:
I see conflicting advice on this. One is to gush into the firehose yourself, search/monitor/alert it and just dip into it a few times a week. The other sort is that it's a social thing, a sort of proprietary centralised IRC replacement. Who is right? I don't know. (I'm mostly using identi.ca too.)
{{count}} days later:
Or you could hop over to http://identi.ca and join the conversations on a free platform.